December 5, 2021

News

News Network

Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Rosemary Barton of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

27 min read

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Washington, D.C.

QUESTION:  Secretary Blinken, nice of you to make the time.  Appreciate it.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  It’s good to be with you.

QUESTION:  Obviously we’re doing this in strange circumstances.  It must be hard to be a diplomat in these times right now.  I’m going to start on that very issue – on the pandemic – because I know it’s top of mind for the administration and certainly the Canadian Government.  Has Canada asked your administration to scrap the executive order aimed at keeping U.S.-produced vaccines inside the United States?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, what I think we’re all working on is making sure that we can get – produce as many vaccines as possible and ultimately get them out to everyone who needs them wherever they are, because at the end of the day, none of us are going to be fully safe until everyone in every part of the world is vaccinated.  You know that as long as the virus is alive somewhere, it’s probably going to be mutating, and if it’s mutating, it can come back to bite us.  The United States, as you know, has just rejoined – or joined COVAX, the international vaccine alliance, and Govi that – Gavi, excuse me – that goes with it.  We have a commitment of $4 billion into that effort, and I think what you’re going to see in the weeks ahead is greater and greater production, and thus greater and greater access of vaccines around the world, including in Canada.

QUESTION:  You are vaccinating your citizens at a much faster rate than Canada, in part because you have the pharmaceutical giants producing the vaccine within the country.  Is there – in what scenario would your closest neighbor and ally start to be able to tap into that production?  Is it once everyone has been vaccinated in the U.S.?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, we’re working on a framework right now for how we can maximize the availability of vaccines.  Of course, we’re focused on getting every American vaccinated, and that’s job one, but we’re also looking at the same time in how we can help get vaccines around the world, because again, this goes to both the right thing to do but the necessary thing to do for our own well-being.  And I think the commitment of $4 billion to COVAX is a very clear sign of our commitment to that effort.

QUESTION:  We are coming up on the one-year anniversary of the border between Canada and the U.S. being shut down, such an extraordinary move.  I know in the conversations with the prime minister and the President this week, that was part of the roadmap, looking at the science that would allow us to open the border.  What has to be in place, in your mind, before we can consider doing that?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, look, let’s start with the fact that I think we’ve managed this remarkably well.  We’ve kept the border going in the sense that we’ve had essential travel that has gone forward.  We’ve made sure that the supply chains and trade could keep going despite the restrictions.  And, of course, we’ve both been focused on public health and public safety.  So we’re going to follow the science, we’re going to follow the facts, and make sure that together as we all bounce back from COVID, we can get this going as quickly and as effectively and as deeply as possible.

We have a 5,000-mile border, and it’s one of the most remarkable things in the world because it’s a – not just a peaceful border, it is a living border that brings our two countries together, our people together every single day.  I’m glad that we found ways to keep things going even during COVID, and now as we both emerge from it, I’m confident we’ll get to that place that we both want.

QUESTION:  But do you have the points that you want to see in order to get to that place?  I mean, does Canada have to be fully vaccinated?  Are you looking at more rapid testing?  What kinds of things are you considering in order to reach that?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  We have our experts looking at that.  Of course, the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control, are in the lead and we’re going to follow their guidance.

QUESTION:  So do you anticipate we are still looking at months yet of the border being closed?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  I don’t want to put a time stamp on it.  I think we have to follow the progress that we’re all making in combating the disease and getting people vaccinated, and again, following the science.  And you know it is changing mostly for the good every single day.  I think we’ve made very rapid progress in the last few weeks.  At the same time, we have variants that are popping up.  We have to be on guard against those and we all have to remain disciplined, because the closer we get to actually getting over the hump and dealing effectively with COVID-19, it’s easy to let down your guard.  People are tired, they’re frustrated, and I understand that profoundly.  But if we can just keep our guard up and keep our vigilance a little while longer, we’re going to get to the other side.

QUESTION:  A couple questions about trade, if I can.  I know that you have a buy America provision in the executive order.  I know that you’ve reassured Canada that it will be consulted as you move forward with the – developing the policy around that.  Is your administration willing to consider an exemption for Canada writ large or some of the industries within Canada?  What is the approach on that?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, first, the buy America provisions have been on the books for a long time, and this goes to government procurement.  This goes to how governments spend taxpayers’ money and the focus there.

QUESTION:  Right.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  But we have – we are each other’s largest trading partners.  We have a remarkably vibrant commercial and trade relationship.  I think the potential going forward, particularly as we’re trying to build more resilient supply chains, something that’s really been I think impressed upon both countries with regard to – after COVID-19 and also some of the challenges posed by China, there is huge opportunity there.

And the other, I think, really big opportunity is, precisely as we rebound from COVID-19, we both have a strong incentive to work together on a whole series of projects as well as to make sure that that trading relationship, already arguably the strongest in the world, grows even stronger.

QUESTION:  So you could understand our apprehension and wariness, though, given the past four years that Canada has experienced.  So should we – so Canada should just take your word that this will all be okay, and we don’t need anything in writing or a clear exemption?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, look, we have the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement that was reached building upon original agreements from a couple of decades ago.  But more to the point –

QUESTION:  Yes.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  — we already have this incredibly vibrant relationship that I am convinced, particularly given some of the new imperatives on supply chains and bouncing back and building back better from COVID-19 where we are such natural partners, I am very confident we’re going to see real growth and expansion in that relationship.

QUESTION:  Okay.  I’m going to move on to China, which, as you know, is of a real concern to this country right now.  You have said China is the most significant threat against American national interests.  Do you think that Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, the two Canadians being detained in China right now, are being held hostage essentially?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  I was pleased – it’s unfortunate it was necessary, but I was very pleased to join the Canadian initiative on the arbitrary detentions that some states, starting with China, are engaged in.  Using people, human beings, as pawns for political purposes, it is totally unacceptable conduct by any country.  And so we stand strongly with Canada when it comes to the need to see the two Michaels released immediately and unconditionally.  We will continue to stand with Canada on that.  I have made that clear in my own conversations with Chinese counterparts.  And we look forward to the day when they are able to return home.

QUESTION:  In December, I’m sure you know that there were some reports that the United States had approached Meng Wanzhou, the Huawei vice president, about the possibility of a deferred prosecution agreement, a sort of plea deal.  Is that still being considered?  Because clearly, China believes that these two cases, these three people, are connected.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  All of these matters are matters for our Department of Justice to look at and consider.  We follow the law.  We follow the facts.  And one of the things that we don’t do is have politics or foreign policy interfere in the workings of the Justice Department.  So these are matters that are properly in their jurisdiction.

QUESTION:  So you have no knowledge about whether that continues or whether that’s a possibility?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Yeah, I’d refer you to the Justice Department.

QUESTION:  You’ve told your – you’ve told Chinese officials that the U.S. will continue to press China over its human rights record in Xinjiang and elsewhere, for that matter.  What does that mean practically?  What could the United States further do to reprimand China?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, I think there are a few things.  First of all, it is really important to speak up, to speak out, and to do so with other countries who share our abhorrence at what is – what’s happening to Uyghurs in Xinjiang or, for that matter, what’s happening to democracy in Hong Kong.

But in terms of practical measures, I think there are a number of things that can be done.  For example, countries should not be supplying any products or technology that can be used for the repression of people in China; for example, the Uyghurs.  Similarly, countries should look at making sure they’re not importing products that are made with forced labor.  Those are very practical things that countries can do and focus on to make sure that not only is our voice loud but our actions are too.

QUESTION:  I’m sure you know that our parliament this week voted to condemn what was happening, yes, but also to suggest that it is indeed a genocide.  However, cabinet and the prime minister abstained from that decision saying they needed more information.  Have you given the Canadian Government information to support confirmation that it is, in fact, a genocide we are seeing there?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, I think each country, each government needs to make its own assessment, its own determination following its laws and practices.  We’ve made clear what we believe, and we look to other countries to make their own determinations.

QUESTION:  So you – do you – you believe it is a genocide; is that accurate?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Yes, I have said so, and I’ve made that clear on behalf of the United States.  President Biden, more importantly, has said so as well.

QUESTION:  And what would be the benefit of a multilateral declaration by countries led by the United States and Canada too of declaring it a genocide?  What would be the impact of that, Secretary?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Look, I think as a general matter we are much more effective when – in dealing with some of the challenges that China poses when we are doing it together.  When countries, democracies, are working together, speaking together, acting together, it’s a lot harder for China to ignore our collective voice and our collective weight than it is for China to ignore each of us individually.  So I think there is – there’s power in numbers.  And ultimately, the world coming together when it sees basic principles and basic standards violated is important in and of itself.

QUESTION:  Are you confident that because the Biden administration and yourself are now bringing this position on China to the world that the two Canadians will be released sooner rather than later?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Look, I certainly very, very much hope so.  And again, the initiative that Canada took to have countries speak as one and join as one against the arbitrary detention by states of their citizens is a significant and important initiative, because what we have to do among – obviously, we have to focus on bringing the two Michaels home.  But more broadly, we have to work together to establish a basic norm in international conduct that this is simply unacceptable.  That takes time.  It takes effort.  It takes sustained effort.

If you go back – it’s a very different thing, but it’s the same basic principle.  After World War I there was an abhorrence of the use of chemical weapons, and countries worked together over decades to establish a norm against their use, and it took hold.  And obviously, we’ve seen violations of that norm, but there is an under – an international understanding on that.  We need an international understanding on the prohibition against arbitrary detentions of countries’ citizens for political purposes.

QUESTION:  Your president has said that America is back.  It’s a refrain that our prime minister used when he first won as well.  I wonder:  How difficult is it to rebuild America’s position of leadership at multilateral organizations and around the world?  How difficult is it, do you think, going to be?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  I’ve been – because I couldn’t – can’t yet travel, I’ve been burning up the phone lines since I’ve been in office.  And as I’ve said, I’m glad we’re on the family telephone plan here, otherwise our budget would be gone.  But I’m finding almost across the board a thirst and a thanks for American engagement, because here’s the – here’s the reality I think we’re all facing, including the United States:  Not a single one of the really big problems that we have to deal with on behalf of our people, things that are going to affect them or are affecting their daily lives, whether it’s changing climate, whether it’s this pandemic, whether it’s potentially the spread of a really dangerous weapon, not a single one can be dealt – can we deal with effectively with any one nation acting alone, even the United States.  There is a premium on cooperation, and the United States has an important role to play in trying to bring countries together to mobilize them in collective action to deal with the challenges that our citizens are facing every single day.

I think partners around the world recognize that, just as we recognize the absolute importance to the United States of having them engaged and having them in the game.  So I’m finding tremendous openness, and more than openness, even just a tremendous desire for this American re-engagement.

Now, that doesn’t mean we’re not going to have differences, we’re not going to have difficulties.  But there is, I think, a sense in country after country that there is more of a premium than there has ever been on countries working together to face these challenges that are literally making a difference in the lives of our fellow Americans, fellow Canadians every single day.

QUESTION:  One last question, and I am – I’m getting a wrap, so I will wrap it up.  But I do know that we are expecting a report on the killing of Jamal Khashoggi and that it will link the crown prince to that killing, that he directed the killing.  Can you confirm that that’s what the report, the declassified report, says and how the United States then will respond to that?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Well, I’ll let the report speak for itself.  I believe it’s going to be issued tomorrow.  We have a law on the books requiring the publication of that report.  We’re determined to follow the law.  We’re determined to have transparency across the board and let the report speak for itself tomorrow.

QUESTION:  Okay.  But how does it influence American policy, I guess, in relation to Saudi Arabia?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  We’ll address all of that tomorrow when the report comes out.  I would say that as President Biden has said, Saudi Arabia remains an important partner for the United States on a whole host of issues, but we want to make sure that that partnership is clearly advancing our interests and reflects our values.

QUESTION:  Secretary, thank you so much for making the time for Canada.  Appreciate it, sir.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thanks.  Good to be with you.

(Break.)

QUESTION: (Via translation) (inaudible)….the two detained Canadians are hostages, and what is the United States ready to do to try to free them?

SECRETARY BLINKEN: (Via translation) On our side, we insist that the two Michaels be able to return home to Canada without any conditions.  And more broadly, the initiative Canada is taking against countries that arbitrarily detain individuals for political reasons, we must all fight this practice and we must come to an understanding in the international community that these practices are unacceptable.  We support the Canadian initiative on this matter, and clearly we support Canada with regards to the return of the two Michaels.

QUESTION:  Your French is excellent.  That’s very impressive, Secretary.  Thank you for being so generous with that and with your time.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thanks.  Good to be with you.

More from: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

News Network

  • Attorney General Merrick B. Garland’s Statement on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons Awareness Day
    In Crime News
    Attorney General Merrick B. Garland issued the following statement:
    [Read More…]
  • Critical Infrastructure Protection: TSA Is Taking Steps to Address Some Pipeline Security Program Weaknesses
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found Protecting the nation's pipeline systems from security threats is a responsibility shared by both the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and private industry stakeholders. Prior to issuing a cybersecurity directive in May 2021, TSA's efforts included issuing voluntary security guidelines and security reviews of privately owned and operated pipelines. GAO reports in 2018 and 2019 identified some weaknesses in the agency's oversight and guidance, and made 15 recommendations to address these weaknesses. TSA concurred with GAO's recommendations and has addressed most of them, such as clarifying portions of its Pipeline Security Guidelines improving its monitoring of security review performance, and assessing staffing needs. As of June 2021, TSA had not fully addressed two pipeline cybersecurity-related weaknesses that GAO previously identified. These weaknesses correspond to three of the 15 recommendations from GAO's 2018 and 2019 reports. Incomplete information for pipeline risk assessments. GAO identified factors that likely limit the usefulness of TSA's risk assessment methodology for prioritizing pipeline security reviews. For example, TSA's risk assessment did not include information consistent with critical infrastructure risk mitigation, such as information on natural hazards and cybersecurity risks. GAO recommended that TSA develop data sources relevant to pipeline threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences of disruptions. As of June 2021, TSA had not fully addressed this recommendation. Aged protocols for responding to pipeline security incidents. GAO reported in June 2019 that TSA had not revised its 2010 Pipeline Security and Incident Recovery Protocol Plan to reflect changes in pipeline security threats, including those related to cybersecurity. GAO recommended that TSA periodically review, and update its 2010 plan. TSA has begun taking action in response to this recommendation, but has not fully addressed it, as of June 2021. TSA's May 2021 cybersecurity directive requires that certain pipeline owner/operators assess whether their current operations are consistent with TSA's Guidelines on cybersecurity, identify any gaps and remediation measures, and report the results to TSA and others. TSA's July 2021 cybersecurity directive mandates that certain pipeline owner/operators implement cybersecurity mitigation measures; develop a Cybersecurity Contingency Response Plan in the event of an incident; and undergo an annual cybersecurity architecture design review, among other things. These recent security directives are important requirements for pipeline owner/operators because TSA's Guidelines do not include key mitigation strategies for owner/operators to reference when reviewing their cyber assets. TSA officials told GAO that a timely update to address current cyber threats is appropriate and that they anticipate updating the Guidelines over the next year. Why GAO Did This Study The nation's pipelines are vulnerable to cyber-based attacks due to increased reliance on computerized systems. In May 2021 malicious cyber actors deployed ransomware against Colonial Pipeline's business systems. The company subsequently disconnected certain systems that monitor and control physical pipeline functions so that they would not be compromised. This statement discusses TSA's actions to address previous GAO findings related to weaknesses in its pipeline security program and TSA's guidance to pipeline owner/operators. It is based on prior GAO products issued in December 2018, June 2019, and March 2021, along with updates on actions TSA has taken to address GAO's recommendations as of June 2021. To conduct the prior work, GAO analyzed TSA documents; interviewed TSA officials, industry association representatives, and a sample of pipeline operators selected based on type of commodity transported and other factors; and observed TSA security reviews. GAO also reviewed TSA's May and July 2021 Pipeline Security Directives, TSA's Pipeline Security Guidelines, and three federal security alerts issued in July 2020, May 2021, and June 2021.
    [Read More…]
  • Joint Statement: The United States and the United Kingdom are Working Together in the Fight Against Climate Change
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • An Information-Centric Perspective on Coherence Collaboration: Analyses of Uganda and Ecuador (Penn State)
    In Human Health, Resources and Services
    Bureau of Population, [Read More…]
  • Transcript of the Transatlantic Trends 2021 Launch Event: A Conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Wendy R. Sherman, Deputy [Read More…]
  • North Carolina Return Preparer Sentenced to Prison for Tax Fraud Scheme
    In Crime News
    A Kinston, North Carolina, woman was sentenced today to 30 months in prison for conspiring to file false tax returns for her clients.
    [Read More…]
  • Brazilian Partnership to Begin Producing NASA-Designed COVID-19 Ventilator
    In Space
    The Brazilian Health [Read More…]
  • Observance of International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women and the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • [Protest of Forest Service Contract Award for Publication Support Services]
    In U.S GAO News
    A firm protested a Forest Service contract award for publication support services, contending that the Forest Service conducted improper post-best and final offer (BAFO) discussions with the awardee. GAO held that the: (1) Service's consideration of the awardee's subcontracting approach constituted discussions and therefore it should have reopened discussions and allowed bidders to resubmit BAFO; and (2) Service conducted improper discussions with only the awardee after BAFO submission. Accordingly, the protest was sustained and GAO recommended that the Forest Service: (1) reopen discussions and request best and final offers; (2) make award to the bidder whose bid is determined to be the most advantageous to the government; and (3) reimburse the protester for its protest costs.
    [Read More…]
  • Army and Marine Corps Training: Better Performance and Cost Data Needed to More Fully Assess Simulation-Based Efforts
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO FoundOver the past several decades, the Army and Marine Corps have increased their use of simulation-based training--simulators and computer-based simulations. Historically, the aviation communities in both services have used simulators to train servicemembers in tasks such as takeoffs, and emergency procedures that could not be taught safely live. In contrast, the services' ground communities used limited simulations prior to 2000. However, advances in technology, and emerging conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to increased use of simulation-based training in the ground forces. For example, in response to increases in vehicle rollovers, both services began using simulators to train servicemembers to safely evacuate vehicles. The services are also collaborating in the development of some simulation-based training devices. For instance, according to Marine Corps officials, the service reused 87 percent of the Army's Homestation Instrumentation Training System's components in its own training system, achieving about $11 million in cost avoidance and saving an estimated 7 years in fielding time. The services are also taking steps to better integrate live and simulation-based training, developing technical capabilities to connect previously incompatible simulation-based training devices. The Army's capability is now being fielded, and the Marine Corps' is in the initial development phase.The Army and Marine Corps consider various factors in determining whether to use live or simulation-based training, but lack key performance and cost information that would enhance their ability to determine the optimal mix of training and prioritize related investments. As the services identify which requirements can be met with either live or simulation-based training or both, they consider factors such as safety and training mission. Also, they have cited numerous benefits of simulation-based training, such as improving servicemember performance in live training events, and reducing operating costs. Both services rely on subject matter experts, who develop their training programs, and after action reports from deployments and training exercises for information on how servicemembers may have benefited from simulation-based training. However, neither service has established outcome metrics to assist them in more precisely measuring the impact of using simulation-based devices to improve performance or proficiency. Leading management practices recognize that performance metrics can help agencies determine the contributions that training makes to improve results. Army and Marine Corps officials also generally consider simulation-based training to be less costly than live training and analyze some data, such as life cycle costs, when considering options to acquire a particular simulation-based training device. However, once simulation-based training devices are fielded, the services neither reevaluate cost information as they determine the mix of training nor have a methodology for determining the costs associated with simulation-based training. Federal internal control standards state that decision makers need visibility over a program's financial data to determine whether the program is meeting the agencies' goals and effectively using resources. Without better performance and cost data, the services lack the information they need to make more fully informed decisions in the future regarding the optimal mix of training and how best to target investments for simulation-based training capabilities.Why GAO Did This StudyThe Army and Marine Corps use live and simulation-based training to meet training goals and objectives. Service officials have noted benefits from the use of simulation-based training--both in terms of training effectiveness and in cost savings or cost avoidance. A House report accompanying the bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for 2012 mandated GAO to review the status of the military services' training programs. This report follows GAO's reports on the Navy and Air Force, and assesses (1) changes in the Army's and Marine Corps' use of simulation-based training, including efforts to integrate live and simulation-based training capabilities; and (2) the factors the Army and Marine Corps consider in determining whether to use live or simulation-based training, including the extent to which they consider performance and cost information. GAO focused on a broad cross-section of occupations (e.g., aviation, armor, artillery), and analyzed service training strategies and other documents; and conducted six site visits and interviewed service officials involved with training and training development for the selected occupations.
    [Read More…]
  • OECD Working Group on Bribery Issues Report Commending United States for Maintaining Leading Role in the Fight Against Transnational Corruption
    In Crime News
    The Working Group on Bribery of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD Working Group) issued its Phase 4 Report of the United States today, announced the U.S. Departments of Justice, Commerce, State, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
    [Read More…]
  • The Scripps Research Institute To Pay $10 Million To Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related To Mischarging NIH-Sponsored Research Grants
    In Crime News
    The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) has agreed to pay the U.S. $10 million to settle claims that it improperly charged NIH-funded research grants for time spent by researchers on non-grant related activities such as developing, preparing, and writing new grant applications, teaching, and engaging in other administrative activities, the Department of Justice announced today. 
    [Read More…]
  • Federal Rulemaking: Selected Agencies Should Fully Describe Public Comment Data and Their Limitations
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found Regulations.gov and selected agency-specific comment websites collect some identity information, such as email address, from commenters who choose to provide it during the public comment process. Based on GAO's survey, the extent to which commenters with email addresses confirmed that they submitted their comments to rulemakings varied across 10 selected agencies (see figure). Specifically, estimates of commenters with email addresses that confirmed their comments ranged from 48 to 87 percent. Conversely, estimates of presumed commenters with email addresses that did not make the comments ranged from 5 to 30 percent, calling into question the actual source of these comments. Most comments at eight selected agencies did not contain email addresses. Although agencies may collect identity information, the law does not require its collection or verification. Agencies must consider the substance of the comment, rather than the identity of the commenter, as part of the rulemaking process. Extent of Commenters with Email Addresses that Confirmed They Submitted Their Comments on 10 Selected Agencies' Rulemaking Proceedings Note: Estimates in this figure have a margin of error of +/- 9 percentage points or fewer, at the 95 percent confidence level. Circles representing each agency's estimates may overlap if the estimates are similar. For example, the circle at the 85 percent level for Yes responses covers two agencies. Various aspects of the commenting process can create limitations for certain external users of public comment data. For example, identity information associated with public comments is self-reported and may not always be accurate. Additionally, some agencies do not post all instances of duplicate comments (identical or near-identical comment text but varied identity information), so the public may not have access to all comment data related to a proposed rule. Almost all of the selected agencies share at least some public comment data online, but they do not always fully describe the available data. Specifically, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not define the data elements that may be present in its comment data. Further, FCC, the General Services Administration (GSA) (which manages Regulations.gov), and the eight selected agencies that use that site do not describe limitations to external users of comment data that may affect their use of the data. Key practices for transparently reporting open government data state that agencies should fully describe the information they share, including any limitations. Providing information about available public comment data and their limitations can help external users make informed decisions about their use of the data and help ensure they do not inadvertently draw inaccurate conclusions from the data. Why GAO Did This Study Federal agencies publish thousands of proposed rules each year and are generally required to provide interested persons (commenters) an opportunity to comment on them. Although the identity information collected varies, agencies are generally required to make public comments available online, to the extent practical. Some rulemakings have received extremely large numbers of comments in recent years, raising questions about the accuracy of the associated identity information. GAO was asked to review issues related to identity information associated with public comments. Among other things, this report examines the extent to which commenters confirmed that they submitted comments on rulemaking proceedings for selected agencies and the challenges that exist for external users in reviewing and analyzing public comment data. GAO selected 10 agencies and obtained electronic comments on their rulemakings that accepted comments from 2013 through 2017. GAO selected generalizable samples of comments with email addresses and surveyed commenters to determine whether they submitted the comments. GAO reviewed comment data and key practices for reporting government data.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Olena Frolyak of ICTV
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • West Texas Gas Companies Agree to Pay $3 Million Civil Penalty in Federal Settlement Requiring $5 Million in Safety Improvements and Clean Air Act Compliance at Eight Natural Gas Processing Plants
    In Crime News
    Five subsidiaries of West Texas Gas Inc. will spend up to $5 million on compliance measures in a settlement that resolves allegations in the United States’ complaint, lodged today, that they violated federal Clean Air Act chemical accident prevention requirements at several of their natural gas processing plants. The companies will pay more than $3 million in civil penalties to resolve claims stemming from fatal chemical accidents and accident prevention program violations.
    [Read More…]
  • Rebuilding Iraq: Status of Funding and Reconstruction Efforts
    In U.S GAO News
    Rebuilding Iraq is a U.S. national security and foreign policy priority and constitutes the largest U.S. assistance program since World War II. Billions of dollars in grants, loans, assets, and revenues from various sources have been made available or pledged to the reconstruction of Iraq. The United States, along with its coalition partners and various international organizations and donors, has embarked on a significant effort to rebuild Iraq following multiple wars and decades of neglect by the former regime. The U.S. effort to restore Iraq's basic infrastructure and essential services is important to attaining U.S. military and political objectives in Iraq and helping Iraq achieve democracy and freedom. This report provides information on (1) the funding applied to the reconstruction effort and (2) U.S. activities and progress made in the oil, power, water, and health sectors and key challenges that these sectors face.As of March 2005, the United States, Iraq, and international donors had pledged or made available more than $60 billion for security, governance, and reconstruction efforts in Iraq. The United States provided about $24 billion (for fiscal years 2003 through 2005) largely for security and reconstruction activities. Of this amount, about $18 billion had been obligated and about $9 billion disbursed. The State department has reported that since July 2004, about $4.7 billion of $18.4 billion in fiscal year 2004 funding has been realigned from large electricity and water projects to security, economic development, and smaller immediate impact projects. From May 2003 through June 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) controlled $23 billion in Iraqi revenues and assets, which was used primarily to fund the operations of the Iraqi government. The CPA allocated a smaller portion of these funds--about $7 billion--for relief and reconstruction projects. Finally, international donors pledged $13.6 billion over 4 years (2004 through 2007) for reconstruction activities, about $10 billion in the form of loans and $3.6 billion in the form of grants. Iraq had accessed $436 million of the available loans as of March 2005. As of the same date, donors had deposited more than $1 billion into funds for multilateral grant assistance, which disbursed about $167 million for the Iraqi elections and other activities, such as education and health projects. The U.S. reconstruction effort in Iraq has undertaken many activities in the oil, power, water, and health sectors and has made some progress, although multiple challenges confront each sector. The U.S. has completed projects in Iraq that have helped to restore basic services, such as rehabilitating oil wells and refineries, increasing electrical generation capacity, restoring water treatment plants, and reestablishing Iraqi basic health care services. However, as of May 2005, Iraq's crude oil production and overall power generation were lower than before the 2003 conflict, although power levels have increased recently; some completed water projects were not functioning as intended; and construction at hospital and clinics is under way. Reconstruction efforts continue to face challenges such as rebuilding in an insecure environment, ensuring the sustainability of completed projects, and measuring program results.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Blinken’s Call with Haitian Prime Minister Henry 
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken and German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas at a Joint Press Availability
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Justice Department Settles Race Discrimination Case Against a Florida City Securing $195,000 in Lost Wages and Damages
    In Crime News
    The Justice Department today announced that it has reached a settlement with the City of Venice, Florida, resolving its race discrimination lawsuit against the city. 
    [Read More…]
  • International Day of Persons with Disabilities
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]

Crime

Network News © 2005 Area.Control.Network™ All rights reserved.