December 9, 2021


News Network

Secretary Antony J. Blinken On the Department’s Health Incidents Response Task Force

19 min read

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Washington, D.C.

Benjamin Franklin Room

SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good morning, everyone.

Every day, thousands of American diplomats and development experts dedicate themselves to advancing the interests and representing the values of the American people.

Their service often comes with risk – both for our Foreign and Civil Service officers, and also at times for the loved ones who accompany them to posts around the world.

And just as they work hard for us, we have to do all we can to protect their health, their safety, their security.

That’s certainly the case when it comes to addressing the threat posed by Anomalous Health Incidents.

These incidents have left our colleagues with profound harm.

They’ve experienced serious physical consequences, including persistent headaches and hearing loss.

They’ve also experienced psychological harm, including trauma, anxiety, depression.

They’ve been affected, their careers have been affected, their families and colleagues have been affected, too.

And all of us in the U.S. Government – and especially we at the State Department – are intently focused on getting to the bottom of what and who is causing these incidents, caring for those who have been affected, and protecting our people.

Even before being sworn in as Secretary, I asked to be fully briefed by the previous administration on what they knew about these Anomalous Health Incidents and what they had done to address them, because this was an issue that we wanted to tackle starting on day one.

Let me speak to some of the ways the State Department has been doing that.

First, we’re ensuring that every employee and family member affected by these incidents gets the medical care and other assistance they might need.

I’m very pleased to share that we recently appointed Ambassador Margaret Uyehara to serve as our senior care coordinator.

A career member of the Foreign Service with three decades of experience at the State Department, she has already gotten to work advocating for those affected, including assisting them with workers’ compensation and the benefits process.

She’s compassionate; she’s effective. We’re grateful for her and her commitment to this vital issue.

Additionally, last month, the State Department began a partnership with Johns Hopkins University to expand the top-tier care available to employees and families who have been affected by Anomalous Health Incidents.

Now they can access the university’s outstanding medical professionals and facilities as well.

Second, we heard from our workforce that they want more information about these incidents.

So we’ve stepped up our communications.

I’m engaging regularly with employees through town halls, messages to our workforce, visits to embassies, and other forums to share what we’ve learning and what we’re doing, and especially to hear directly from our people.

Other senior leaders are doing the same.

Across all of these meetings, we’re emphasizing the same message over and over, because it’s so important. There is absolutely no stigma in reporting these incidents, and there will, of course, be no negative consequences of any kind.

On the contrary, reporting means that we can get people the help they need.

And by reporting, you can help keep others safe – and help us get to the bottom of who and what is responsible.

In every embassy and consulate, Diplomatic Security and Medical Services staff have been instructed to take seriously every report of an Anomalous Health Incident, to follow standard guidance in responding to them, and to report them up the chain.

We’ve also made sure that employees and leaders know how to report these incidents.

And in May, we set up a dedicated channel for employees or family members who can – if they choose – send questions anonymously about these health incidents and receive prompt answers.

Communication runs in both directions.

We aren’t only talking; we’re also listening.

That includes regularly meeting with individuals affected by Anomalous Health Incidents.

And I’m profoundly grateful to those employees and their loved ones for being willing to share their experiences, as painful as they may be, and for giving us their honest and forthright opinions about how we can better be there for them and others in this difficult situation.

Third, we’re making sure that every member of our workforce is empowered with the information to help identify and prevent these incidents.

As you may know, the State Department created our Health Incidents Response Task Force in 2018 to run point on this challenge.

Its mandate is to help ensure care for all U.S. personnel and dependents under chief of mission responsibility, strengthening mitigation and prevention, and improving coordination and cooperation across U.S. Government agencies.

Since the summer, overseas employees and spouses at posts worldwide have received information on Anomalous Health Incidents during their initial security briefings.

And the Health Incidents Response Task Force has been working with the Foreign Service Institute to develop a training module on these incidents, which will be included in the standard Security Overseas Seminar for employees and family members starting soon.

Fourth, we’re constantly improving our assessment tools so we can better identify, understand, and respond to these incidents.

We continue to draw on the expertise of the team that our Bureau of Medical Services assembled to respond to reports of possible incidents.

We developed the clinical triage tool that standardizes the medical assessments of these incidents for individuals across affected agencies, and in June we updated it.

That same month, we launched a pilot program to collect baseline health information here in Washington from employees and eligible family members.

We’re capturing people’s neurological, cognitive, ocular, auditory, and vestibular data so we have a point of reference and comparison if they later report an Anomalous Health Incident.

I spent some time yesterday at the Medical Command Center. I was very impressed by the rigor, the professionalism, the empathy that our colleagues are bringing to this challenge.

We’ve also deployed teams of security specialists and occupational safety experts to inspect the locations where incidents have been reported.

We’re feeding all of the information we gather into a whole-of-government effort aimed at determining what is behind these incidents.

And that’s my fifth point: We’re working tirelessly with partners across the government to identify what is causing these incidents and to learn who is responsible.

This is an urgent priority for President Biden, for me, for our entire government.

And we will do absolutely everything we can – leaving no stone unturned – to stop these occurrences as swiftly as possible.

And while I can’t go into all the ways we’re doing that, I want to assure you that we’re pursuing every possible lead and sparing no resources, including when it comes to protecting personnel around the world.

We’re drawing on the full capacity of our Intelligence Community; we’re enlisting the best scientific minds inside and outside of government.

We’re also very fortunate to have Congress as a partner in this.

Their attention and leadership on this issue has been vital.

For example, they recently enacted the Havana Act, which provides an additional benefit to federal employees who have suffered serious harm from these incidents.

Sixth, we’re developing, obtaining, and deploying technology to the field to protect our personnel.

The details I can provide on this are limited as well, but I can say that new technology is helping us more quickly and thoroughly evaluate a variety of potential causes of these incidents, and we’ve distributed it across posts so that we can respond rapidly to new reports.

Finally, I’m pleased to announce the new head of our Health Incident Response Task Force: Ambassador Jonathan Moore.

Jonathan brings decades of experience grappling with complex policy challenges.

His career in the Foreign Service has taken him from posts around the globe, from Bosnia to Namibia, and he’s managed portfolios ranging from Russia policy to engagement with the United Nations.

Across each of his assignments, Jonathan has brought a strong analytical capacity and fidelity to the facts.

He knows the State Department.

He knows the inter-agency process.

And he cares about the people he works with, which is particularly important for this assignment, for which treating people with empathy and decency is absolutely key.

And I know we can count on Jonathan and Margaret – who will be working together closely – to do just that.

I’m looking to them both to keep me and our senior leadership team fully informed of our progress, including in areas where we can do more.

Margaret and Jonathan will speak here today about the work they and their teams will do on this critical issue.

Before I turn it over to them, one final point.

The strength of the State Department, like every institution, comes down to our people.

If we want the State Department to be as strong as it can be and the most effective advocate for our interests and values around the world, we have to take care of the people who serve here.

That’s our most important duty.

That’s my most important responsibility.

And we will be vigorous and steadfast in fulfilling it.

Thank you.

And now, Jonathan, over to you.

AMBASSADOR MOORE: Mr. Secretary, thank you very much for this opportunity, for your leadership, and for making clear that keeping us and our families safe is your top priority. Thank you as well for making clear that I can come to you directly on any issue that could benefit from your engagement. I am deeply honored to accept this responsibility.

Throughout more than three decades as a U.S. diplomat, including nearly two years with our distinguished Global Health Diplomacy Team on COVID, working with and getting to know my State Department colleagues overseas and in Washington has been a special source of enjoyment. Taking care of our people has been consistently the most rewarding and memorable aspect of my work, and as you and others, like Colin Powell, have pointed out, it is of course the right thing to do.

Mr. Secretary, I will keep you, the department, and Congress informed and work with others throughout the U.S. Government. As you have confirmed, the most important element of this task is to provide respect, trust, support, information, and compassion to everyone – Foreign Service, Civil Service, and family members – affected by these incidents.

The task force and I believe and respect those who come forward in reporting incidents and will be relentless in our efforts to provide them the care that they need, just as we take measures to educate and protect our broader workforce.

Sir, to reiterate your message, I want to underscore that every report will be taken seriously by me, our health and security professionals, and the leadership of the department. I would humbly ask all of you who have been hurt as a result of these incidents to report your symptoms and concerns if you have not done so already, and to please be willing to speak with us. With the Secretary’s direct endorsement, I will continue and expand the efforts of the State Department to provide you with equitable and respectful support.

Thank you very much. It is now my pleasure to turn matters over and reintroduce Senior Care Coordinator Margaret Uyehara.

AMBASSADOR UYEHARA: Thank you very, very much. I am so honored to have been asked by the Secretary of State to serve as the senior care coordinator for the State Department. As the Secretary has underscored, nothing is more important than the safety and security of our personnel, both overseas and domestically. The care coordination team and the Bureau of Global Talent Management is a key part of the Secretary’s efforts to take care of the State Department’s most valuable resource – its people – and to support injured employees and family members by advocating for their best interests, facilitating communication, and recommending and implementing improved policies.

We will continue to work tirelessly to provide the highest possible level of assistance, and to ensure that those who are injured are treated with the empathy and compassion that they so richly deserve. We look forward to working with our colleagues in other federal agencies, as well as in Congress, on this very important issue.

Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary, for the faith and trust that you have given me and my team. And of course, congratulations, Jonathan; I look forward to working with you again. Thank you very much.

QUESTION: Mr. Blinken, what have you learned from speaking to the victims?

SECRETARY BLINKEN: Pretty simple: People have been profoundly, profoundly affected by this. And when you sit down with our people and hear what’s happened to them, how they’ve been affected, it’s very, very powerful. And it only reinforces in me the absolute conviction that we need to do everything possible for our people – to care for them, to protect them, to get to the bottom of what happened. But you can’t help but being personally affected when you hear directly from our folks – their stories, how they’ve been affected, how this has affected their lives.

We will get to the bottom of this, and meanwhile we’ll do everything we can to care for our people. Thanks.

MR PRICE: Thank you very much, everyone.

More from: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
More from Area Control Network
1. Global Warming Network
2. Christians Online
3. Put your website in the archives
4. Area Control Network News

News Network

  • U.S.-Armenia-Azerbaijan Joint Statement
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • Statement of Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers on the Public Release of the Department’s Findings with Respect to the 29 FISA Applications that Were the Subject of the March 2020 OIG Preliminary Report
    In Crime News
    “The Department of Justice has completed its review of the 29 FISA applications that were the subject of preliminary findings by the DOJ Inspector General (OIG) in March 2020.  We are pleased that our review of these applications concluded that all contained sufficient basis for probable cause and uncovered only two material errors, neither of which invalidated the authorizations granted by the FISA Court.   These findings, together with the more than 40 corrective actions undertaken by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Division, should instill confidence in the FBI’s use of FISA authorities.  We would like to express our appreciation to the OIG for their focus on the Department’s use of its national security authority.  We remain committed to improving the FISA process to ensure that we use these tools consistent with the law and our obligations to the FISA Court.  The ability to surveil and to investigate using FISA authorities remains critical to confronting current national security threats, including election interference, Chinese espionage and terrorism.”      
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Blinken’s Call with Democratic Republic of Congo President Tshisekedi
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • [Protest of Army Contract Award for Commissary Construction]
    In U.S GAO News
    A firm protested an Army contract award for commissary design and construction, contending that the Army failed to: (1) follow the specified criteria in evaluating the awardee's proposal; and (2) maintain the integrity of the competitive bidding system, since it did not award the contract to the low, technically acceptable bidder. GAO held that the Army: (1) reasonably evaluated proposals and assigned additional points for innovative or creative design features that exceeded commercial standards; and (2) properly awarded to the higher-priced, technically superior bidder. Accordingly, the protest and claim for reimbursement for bid and protest preparation costs were denied.
    [Read More…]
  • Public Designation of Five Bulgarian Public Officials Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
  • Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco Announces Creation of New Cyber Fellows Positions
    In Crime News
    Today, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced the creation of a new Cyber Fellowship program, designed to develop a new generation of prosecutors and attorneys equipped to handle emerging national security threats.
    [Read More…]
  • Egypt Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
  • Federal Protective Service: Better Documented Cost Estimates Could Help Stakeholders Make Security Decisions
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found The Federal Protective Service (FPS) provides security and protection at more than 9,000 federal facilities. FPS performs a variety of security activities in conjunction with the General Services Administration (GSA), which functions as the landlord at most of these facilities, and with the federal agencies, which occupy these facilities as tenants. These stakeholders can provide important perspectives on FPS's performance of its key activities (see figure). The Federal Protective Service's Three Key Security Activities Stakeholders expressed satisfaction with many aspects of FPS's performance of key activities but also identified aspects where they thought FPS could make improvements. For example, stakeholders expressed satisfaction with the professionalism of FPS personnel and commended FPS's coordination in responding to law enforcement incidents. However, some stakeholders said they would like to see FPS oversee contract guards more often. In addition, many stakeholders said that FPS could improve the cost estimates in its security assessment reports. GAO's review of FPS's Facility Security Assessment reports found that cost estimates for the recommended security measures lacked information that could help stakeholders make decisions to accept or reject FPS's recommendations. Specifically, recent reports for 27 selected buildings did not document (1) the assumptions FPS made to produce the cost estimates (e.g., the scope of work) and (2) the sources FPS used to create the estimate. In one report, for example, FPS recommended additional fencing and provided a cost estimate with an exact dollar amount. However, FPS did not document the assumptions it used to develop the estimate, such as the height and linear feet of fence or the fencing material. According to GAO's Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide , cost estimates should provide information about the assumptions and sources used to develop an estimate so that decision-makers can understand the level of uncertainty around the estimate. By providing detailed information about the cost estimates in Facility Security Assessment reports, FPS could better inform stakeholders and potentially increase implementation of recommended security measures, designed to increase the safety of people and property at these facilities. Why GAO Did This Study Over one million employees and a range of visitors seeking services at federal facilities depend on FPS to ensure the safety of both people and property at these locations. This report examines stakeholders' perspectives on FPS's performance of three key activities. GAO identified key activities from FPS data on work hours. GAO held discussion groups with stakeholders from 27 randomly selected facilities where FPS provided guard services and responded to incidents in fiscal year 2019 and analyzed stakeholder responses from 2017-2019 to GSA's and FPS's feedback instruments. These sources of stakeholder views are not representative but collectively provide insight into stakeholders' satisfaction with how FPS is performing key activities. GAO also reviewed agency documents; interviewed FPS officials about FPS's performance; and compared FPS's security assessment reports to criteria in GAO's Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide .
    [Read More…]
  • An Information-Centric Perspective on Coherence Collaboration: Analyses of Uganda and Ecuador (Penn State)
    In Human Health, Resources and Services
    Bureau of Population, [Read More…]
  • Statement by Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall on the Passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    In Crime News
    Acting Solicitor General [Read More…]
  • Maryland Tax Preparers Sentenced to Prison for Conspiring to Defraud the IRS
    In Crime News
    Two Maryland tax return preparers were sentenced to prison for conspiring to defraud the United States and preparing false tax returns. Lenore Worthy was sentenced yesterday to six months in prison and Veronica Fortune was sentenced on Sept. 14 to 12 months and one day in prison.
    [Read More…]
  • Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Addresses the National Association of Attorneys General
    In Crime News
    More from: December 7, [Read More…]
  • The United States Imposes Sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong Persons for Activities Related to Supporting the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • Supplement Retailers Plead Guilty in Cases Involving Distribution of Designer Steroids as Dietary Supplements
    In Crime News
    Two men and a California business each pleaded guilty this week to conspiring to distribute consumer products that contained designer anabolic steroids.
    [Read More…]
  • The United States Advances Democratic Values Under the Lima Commitment
    In Human Health, Resources and Services
    Bureau of Western [Read More…]
  • Defense Health Care: Efforts to Ensure Beneficiaries Access Specialty Care and Receive Timely and Effective Care
    In U.S GAO News
    The Department of Defense (DOD) has a general expectation that its health care beneficiaries, upon receiving an urgent referral to see a specialist, will access that specialty care in 3 days or less. GAO's analysis of 16,754 urgent referrals at military treatment facilities (MTF) shows that DOD beneficiaries accessed specialty care services in 3 days or less for more than half of the urgent referrals. About 9 percent of the urgent referrals involved beneficiaries waiting 3 weeks or longer to be seen. According to DOD officials, some beneficiaries may have waited longer than 3 days due to factors such as patient preference, appointment availability, or waiting for lab results. Time to access care varied by specialty, with beneficiaries urgently referred to ophthalmology generally seeing a specialist the fastest, and those urgently referred to mental health and oncology generally waiting the longest. According to DOD officials, MTFs are responsible for monitoring beneficiaries' access to specialty care through urgent referrals. GAO found that the monitoring processes used varied by MTF and specialty care clinic at the five selected MTFs that GAO reviewed. For example, officials from one MTF told GAO they centrally manage all urgent referrals using a daily report to address any delays, while officials from another MTF told GAO that individual specialty care clinics are responsible for managing their own urgent referrals. DOD officials acknowledged such variation and MTFs have been directed to centralize their referral management and monitoring processes—an effort that is currently underway. GAO found that DOD monitors the rates at which beneficiaries receive timely and effective care, in part, through 10 outpatient health care quality measures. These measures allow DOD to make comparisons to civilian health care systems, and they are reviewed by various DOD groups at least quarterly. However, DOD officials told GAO that since October 2017, they have been unable to monitor nine of the 10 measures for MTFs using Military Health System (MHS) Genesis, DOD's new electronic health record system. According to the officials, DOD's current data warehouse—a system that stores some MHS Genesis data and can be used by MTFs to create reports on quality measures—is not capable of producing accurate reports for those measures. DOD officials told GAO they expect to implement a new data warehouse by the end of 2020. DOD officials also said they are importing data related to quality measures into another system used for quality monitoring; however, DOD does not have a targeted date for completing these data imports. Until these actions are fully implemented, groups responsible for monitoring quality care will continue to lack the data needed to offer assurance that the growing number of MTFs using MHS Genesis are providing beneficiaries with timely and effective care that will lead to better health outcomes. A draft of this report recommended that DOD establish a timeline to complete importing the quality measure-related data from MHS Genesis into DOD's system used for quality monitoring. In its review of the draft, DOD concurred with the recommendation and established a timeline for importing the data, to be available in DOD's system no later than May 2021. After reviewing the information DOD provided, GAO removed the recommendation from the final report. DOD is responsible for ensuring that beneficiaries have access to specialty care for conditions that, while not life-threatening, require immediate attention, as well as for ensuring that beneficiaries receive timely and effective care for certain routine or other services. A report accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 included a provision for GAO to review the quality of health care in the MHS. This report examines (1) the timeliness with which beneficiaries access specialty care at MTFs through urgent referrals and DOD's efforts to monitor access, and (2) DOD's use of quality measures to monitor and improve the rates of timely and effective care received by beneficiaries at MTFs. GAO examined relevant policies, national DOD referral data (a total of 16,754 urgent referrals) for a 1-year period ending August 2019, and the most recent available quality measure data (April 2020). GAO interviewed officials from five MTFs, selected for variation in military services, geography, provision of select specialty services, and use of the electronic health record system. For more information, contact Debra A. Draper at (202) 512-7114 or
    [Read More…]
  • Organ Transplants: Changes in Allocation Policies for Donated Livers and Lungs
    In U.S GAO News
    The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) develops allocation policies in the United States to determine which transplant candidates receive offers for organs, such as livers or lungs, that are donated from deceased donors. In July 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees OPTN, directed it to change the liver allocation policy to be more consistent with federal regulations. The liver allocation policy changed in February 2020 from a system that, in general, offered donated livers first to the sickest candidates within the fixed boundaries of a donation service area or region to a system based on a candidate's level of illness and distance from the donor hospital. The current liver allocation policy offers livers first to the sickest candidates within 500 nautical miles of the donor hospital using a series of distance-based concentric circles, called acuity circles. The processes used to develop the liver and lung allocation policies had various similarities and differences. For example, while the current liver allocation policy, the 2017 liver allocation policy, and the current lung allocation policy each had public comment periods, the length of these comment periods varied—25 days for the current liver allocation policy; two separate 62-day and 64-day periods for the 2017 liver allocation policy; and 61 days (retroactive) for the current lung allocation policy. In addition, the current lung allocation policy resulted in part from a federal district court order directing HHS to initiate emergency review of the policy. However, the 2017 liver allocation policy—that was approved but never implemented—resulted from a 2012 OPTN Board directive to reduce geographic disparities in organ allocation. HHS oversight of OPTN's processes were similar for all three allocation policies and included reviewing the proposed changes to the policies to ensure compliance with federal regulations, according to HHS officials. Timeline of Selected Events Related to Three Organ Allocation Policies Organ transplantation is the leading form of treatment for patients with severe organ failure. OPTN, a nonprofit entity that was established in 1984 under the National Organ Transplant Act, manages the nation's organ allocation system. In 2019, 32,322 organs were transplanted from deceased donors in the United States. Nevertheless, as of July 2020, close to 110,000 individuals remained on waiting lists for donor organs. Previously, donated livers and lungs were generally offered first to the sickest candidates in donation service areas. However, livers and lungs are now generally offered first to the sickest candidates based on distance. GAO was asked to review the changes to the liver and lung allocation policies. This report describes (1) changes to the liver allocation policy, and (2) similarities and differences in the processes OPTN used to change the liver and lung allocation policies, and federal oversight of these processes, among other things. GAO reviewed documents, including those related to the current liver and lung allocation policies, and the 2017 liver allocation policy; interviewed HHS officials and OPTN members; reviewed the National Organ Transplant Act and its implementing regulations; and conducted a literature review of studies published from January 2017 through April 2020 in peer-reviewed and other publications. HHS and the United Network for Organ Sharing (the contractor serving as OPTN) provided technical comments on a draft of this report, which GAO incorporated as appropriate. For more information, contact James Cosgrove at (202) 512-7114 or
    [Read More…]
  • Presidential Election in The Gambia
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
  • COVID-19 Loans: SBA Has Begun to Take Steps to Improve Oversight and Fraud Risk Management
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found In April 2020, the Small Business Administration (SBA) quickly implemented the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and expedited the processing of Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) and a new EIDL advance program. These important programs have helped businesses survive during the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to move quickly on these programs, SBA initially put limited internal controls in place, leaving both susceptible to program integrity issues, improper payments, and fraud. Because of concerns about program integrity, GAO added PPP and the EIDL program onto its High-Risk List in March 2021. SBA has begun to take steps to address these initial deficiencies: PPP oversight. Because ongoing oversight is crucial, GAO recommended in June 2020 that SBA develop plans to respond to PPP risks to ensure program integrity, achieve program effectiveness, and address potential fraud. Since then, SBA has developed a loan review process and added up-front verifications before it approves new loans. Improper payments for PPP. GAO recommended in November 2020 that SBA expeditiously estimate improper payments for PPP and report estimates and error rates. SBA has now developed a plan for the testing needed to estimate improper payments. Analyzing EIDL data. Based on evidence of widespread potential fraud for EIDL, GAO recommended in January 2021 that SBA conduct portfolio-level analysis to detect potentially ineligible applications. SBA has not announced plans to implement this recommendation. EIDL oversight. GAO recommended in March 2021 that SBA implement a comprehensive oversight plan for EIDL to ensure program integrity. SBA agreed to implement such a plan. Assessment of fraud risks. SBA has not conducted a formal fraud risk assessment for PPP or the EIDL program. GAO made four recommendations in March 2021, including that SBA conduct a formal assessment and develop a strategy to manage fraud risks for each program. SBA said it would work to complete fraud risk assessments for PPP and EIDL and continually monitor fraud risks. Financial statement audit. In December 2020, SBA's independent financial statement auditor issued a disclaimer of opinion on SBA's fiscal year 2020 consolidated financial statements because SBA could not provide adequate documentation to support a significant number of transactions and account balances related to PPP and EIDL. GAO continues to review information SBA recently provided, including data on PPP loan forgiveness and details on the PPP and EIDL loan review processes. In addition, GAO has obtained additional information from a survey of PPP participating lenders, interviews with SBA's PPP contractors, and written responses to questions provided by SBA's EIDL contractor and subcontractors. Why GAO Did This Study SBA has made or guaranteed about 18.7 million loans and grants through PPP and the EIDL program, providing about $968 billion to help small businesses adversely affected by COVID-19. PPP provides potentially forgivable loans to small businesses, and EIDL provides low-interest loans of up to $2 million for operating and other expenses, as well as advances (grants). This testimony discusses the lack of controls in PPP and the EIDL program and SBA's efforts to improve its oversight of these programs. It is based largely on GAO's June 2020–March 2021 reports on the federal response, including by SBA, to the economic downturn caused by COVID-19 (GAO-20-625, GAO-20-701, GAO-21-191, GAO-21-265, GAO -21-387). For those reports, GAO reviewed SBA documentation and SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports; analyzed SBA data; and interviewed officials from SBA, the SBA OIG, and the Department of the Treasury.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Blinken Delivers Virtual Remarks at the Malmö International Forum on Holocaust Remembrance and Combating Antisemitism
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]


Network News © 2005 Area.Control.Network™ All rights reserved.