Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
London, United Kingdom
No. 10 Downing
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Good afternoon. Always a great pleasure to welcome the U.S. Secretary of State.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: And congratulations again for your achievement and how wonderful to have you here. And I’ve been admiring what you’ve been saying since you’ve been here. How long have you actually been here?
SECRETARY BLINKEN: It feels like – we’ve gotten so much work done, thanks to Dominic and the team.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Good, good.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: But it’s been about 24 hours.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: 24 hours.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Built a lot of capacity.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Good. Well, it’s great to see you.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: And I’m just so, so pleased to be here and so pleased to see you again.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Lovely to see you. I think we last saw each other at the UN —
SECRETARY BLINKEN: That’s right.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: — where we were – you were – talking with our friend Mr. Sergey Lavrov, who we both admire in a kind of way.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Indeed.
PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Anyway, listen, everybody. I think the U.S. Secretary and I – Tony and I are going to have a bit of a full discussion now, if that’s okay. Thank you all very much for your time.
SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you.
- Justice Department Settles Sexual Harassment and Race Discrimination Lawsuit Against Manager and Owners of Virginia Rental PropertiesBy Sam NewsSeptember 29, 2020The Justice Department today announced that Gary T. Price, a manager of rental properties in and around Harrisonburg, Virginia, together with owners of the properties, Alberta Lowery and GTP Investment Properties, LLC, will pay $335,000 to resolve allegations that Price sexually harassed multiple female tenants and discriminated in housing on the basis of race in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act.[Read More…]
- Coast Guard: A More Systematic Process to Resolve Recommended Actions Could Enhance Future Surge OperationsBy Sam NewsSeptember 21, 2021What GAO Found From 2007 through 2020, the Coast Guard conducted 23 major surge operations—high-intensity, short-notice efforts to respond to catastrophic events or emergencies, such as hurricanes, oil spills, and humanitarian events. To support these surge operations, the Coast Guard deployed varying levels of personnel, aircraft, and vessels according to the events’ severity and duration. Photo of Coast Guard Personnel Responding to Hurricane Harvey (2017) The Coast Guard documents lessons learned and best practices from its major surge operations and develops recommended actions to help improve future operations. The Coast Guard also has processes for assigning recommended actions to appropriate headquarters offices and field units. However, GAO’s analysis of Coast Guard data on major surge operations shows that it has not met its goals of (1) resolving 80 percent of recommended actions or (2) resolving the actions within 18 months of being assigned. GAO analysis also found that Coast Guard headquarters offices have a higher proportion of unresolved recommended actions compared with field units. The Coast Guard Strategic Plan for 2018-2022 calls for acting on lessons learned and best practices from surge events as important factors for improving emergency management. However, the Coast Guard lacks assurance that recommended actions to address surge operation deficiencies are tracked, updated, and resolved in line with program goals. Without a more systematic process to help ensure that this occurs, the Coast Guard may not address identified issues that could affect its ability to effectively conduct future surge operations. The Coast Guard was generally able to meet statutory mission performance targets in years that it also conducted surge operations. While Coast Guard data showed variation in mission activities in years with concurrent or back-to-back surge operations, GAO was not able to determine the effect that surge operations had on mission activities because of multiple factors beyond surge operations, such as personnel transfers, that can also affect mission activities. Additionally, Coast Guard officials did not identify any statutory or regulatory impediments to the Coast Guard’s ability to conduct surge operations. Why GAO Did This Study The U.S. Coast Guard has multimission responsibilities to support response efforts and help protect life, property, and the environment. The Coast Guard must often rely on surge operations to reduce the impacts of catastrophic events, such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 and Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria in 2017. The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 includes a provision for GAO to review the Coast Guard’s surge capacity to respond to catastrophic events. This report addresses (1) the number of major surge operations the Coast Guard conducted from 2007 through 2020, and what personnel and assets it used to support these operations; (2) the extent the Coast Guard documents lessons learned and best practices from its major surge operations and resolves related recommended actions; and (3) how surge operations have affected the Coast Guard's ability to conduct its statutory missions. GAO reviewed, among other things, documentation from Coast Guard surge operations from 2007 through 2020; analyzed after-action reports and performance metrics; and interviewed Coast Guard officials.[Read More…]
- The United States Condemns Venezuela’s Fraudulent Legislative ElectionsBy Sam NewsDecember 7, 2020Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
- New York Fisherman and Fish Dealer Charged with Conspiracy, Fraud, and ObstructionBy Sam NewsApril 21, 2021Today, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of New York unsealed the indictment of one fisherman, a wholesale fish dealer, and two of its managers for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and obstruction in connection with a scheme to illegally overharvest fluke and black sea bass. All four defendants are from Montauk.[Read More…]
- Remarks at the Fifth Session of the UN Environment Assembly Leadership DialogueBy Sam NewsFebruary 26, 2021Ambassador Marcia [Read More…]
- Justice Department Settles with a Car Rental Services Company to Resolve Immigration-Related DiscriminationBy Sam NewsNovember 10, 2020The Justice Department announced today that it signed a settlement agreement with Fleetlogix Inc. (Fleetlogix) resolving claims that the company discriminated against work-authorized non-U.S. citizens by requiring them to provide specific and unnecessary work authorization documentation because of their citizenship or immigration status. Fleetlogix, based in San Diego, California, operates offices nationwide that provide cleaning and transportation services to rental car companies.[Read More…]
- Panama Travel AdvisoryBy Sam NewsSeptember 26, 2020Do not travel to Panama [Read More…]
- Secretary Antony J. Blinken With Major Garrett of CBS Face the NationBy Sam NewsAugust 22, 2021Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
- Military Personnel: DOD Actions Needed to Improve the Efficiency of Mobilizations for Reserve ForcesBy Sam NewsAugust 24, 2021On September 14, 2001, President Bush proclaimed that a national emergency existed by reason of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code, the President is allowed to call up to 1 million National Guard and Reserve members to active duty for up to 2 years. GAO was asked to review issues related to the call-up of reservists following September 11, 2001. GAO examined (1) whether the Department of Defense (DOD) followed existing operation plans when mobilizing forces, (2) the extent to which responsible officials had visibility over the mobilization process, and (3) approaches the services have taken to provide predictability to reservists. GAO also determined the extent to which the Ready Reserve forces, which make up over 98 percent of nonretired reservists, were available.About 300,000 of the 1.2 million National Guard and Reserve personnel have been called to active duty since September 11, 2001. They fought on the front lines in Iraq; tracked terrorists throughout Asia and Africa; maintained the peace in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and now Iraq; and participated in a wide range of domestic missions. However, DOD's process to mobilize reservists after September 11 had to be modified and contained numerous inefficiencies. Existing operation plans did not fully address the mobilization requirements needed to deal with the terrorist attacks or uncertain overseas requirements. For example, no previous requirements called for the extended use of National Guard and Reserve members to fly combat air patrols over the nation's capital and major cities. Because DOD could not rely on existing operation plans to guide its mobilizations, it used a modified process that relied on additional management oversight and multiple layers of coordination, which resulted in a process that was slower and less efficient than the traditional process. Under the modified process, the Secretary of Defense signed 246 deployment orders to mobilize over 280,000 reservists compared to the less than 10 deployment orders needed to mobilize over 220,000 reservists during the 1991 Persian Gulf War. DOD did not have visibility over the entire mobilization process primarily because it lacked adequate systems for tracking personnel and other resources. DOD's primary automated readiness reporting system could not adequately track the personnel and other resources within the small units that were frequently needed. Also, visibility was lost because some services' active and reserve systems for tracking personnel were incompatible, resulting in ad hoc coordination between active and reserve officials. Both groups often resorted to tracking mobilizations with computer spreadsheets. In addition, some reservists were deployed beyond dates specified in their orders or stayed on alert for more than a year and never mobilized because officials lost visibility. The services have used two primary approaches--predictable operating cycles and advance notification--to provide time for units and personnel to prepare for mobilizations. All the services provide predictability to portions of their forces through some type of standard operating cycle, but only the Air Force has a standard operating cycle that brings predictability to both its active and reserve forces. The Army prioritizes its units, and lower-priority units generally need extra training and preparation time before deploying. Yet, since September 11, a number of lower-priority units have been mobilized with relatively little advance notice. Despite the large number of lower-priority units within the Army Guard and Reserve, the Army does not have a standard operating cycle to provide predictability to its reserves. Without such a concept, the Army's opportunities to provide extra training and preparation time to its reserve forces are limited. Mobilizations were hampered because one-quarter of the Ready Reserve was not readily available for mobilization. Over 70,000 reservists could not be mobilized because they had not completed their training requirements, and the services lacked information needed to fully use the 300,000 pretrained IRR members.[Read More…]
- Curacao Travel AdvisoryBy Sam NewsSeptember 26, 2020Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
- U.S. Government Launches First One-Stop Ransomware Resource at StopRansomware.govBy Sam NewsJuly 15, 2021Today, as part of the ongoing response, agencies across the U.S. government announced new resources and initiatives to protect American businesses and communities from ransomware attacks.[Read More…]
- Priority Open Recommendations: Internal Revenue ServiceBy Sam NewsJune 14, 2021What GAO Found In April 2020, GAO identified 24 priority recommendations for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Since then, IRS has implemented 9 of those recommendations by, among other things, defining appropriate levels of telephone and correspondence service for taxpayers and developing a strategy to improve services to taxpayers across all service channels. In June 2021, GAO identified 10 additional priority recommendations for IRS, bringing the total number to 25. These recommendations involve the following areas: Improve payment integrity Reduce tax fraud Improve information security Improve audit effectiveness Improve taxpayer services Enhance strategic human capital management Enhance information reporting Full implementation of these recommendations could significantly improve IRS's operations. Why GAO Did This Study Priority open recommendations are the GAO recommendations that warrant priority attention from heads of key departments or agencies because their implementation could save large amounts of money; improve congressional and/or executive branch decision-making on major issues; eliminate mismanagement, fraud, and abuse; or ensure that programs comply with laws and funds are legally spent, among other benefits. Since 2015 GAO has sent letters to selected agencies to highlight the importance of implementing such recommendations. For more information, contact James R. McTigue, Jr. or Jessica Lucas-Judy at (202) 512-6806 or firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com.[Read More…]
- U.S. Policy Toward China: Deputy Secretary Biegun’s Remarks to the Senate Foreign Relations CommitteeBy Sam NewsSeptember 27, 2020Stephen Biegun, Deputy [Read More…]
- Rewards for Information to Bring Mexican Drug Traffickers to JusticeBy Sam NewsNovember 5, 2021Ned Price, Department [Read More…]
- Government Auditing Standards: 2018 Revision Technical Update April 2021 (Supersedes GAO-18-568G)By Sam NewsApril 14, 2021The Yellow Book provides standards and guidance for auditors and audit organizations, outlining the requirements for audit reports, professional qualifications for auditors, and audit organization quality control. Auditors of federal, state, and local government programs use these standards to perform their audits and produce their reports. Effective Date The 2018 revision of the Yellow Book is effective for financial audits, attestation engagements, and reviews of financial statements for periods ending on or after June 30, 2020, and for performance audits beginning on or after July 1, 2019. Early implementation is not permitted. The technical updates to the 2018 revision of the Yellow Book are effective upon issuance. Revision Process Yellow Book revisions undergo an extensive, deliberative process, including public comments and input from the Comptroller General's Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards. GAO considered all comments and input in finalizing revisions to the standards. For more information, contact James R. Dalkin at (202) 512-9535 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit our Yellow Book website for more information on applicable updates and alerts.[Read More…]
- Secretary Blinken’s Call with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Al-Thani By Sam NewsAugust 17, 2021Office of the [Read More…]
- Operation Legend: Case of the DayBy Sam NewsSeptember 14, 2020Each weekday, the Department of Justice will highlight a case that has resulted from Operation Legend. Today’s case is out of the Eastern District of Michigan. Operation Legend launched in Detroit on July 29, 2020, in response to the city facing increased homicide and non-fatal shooting rates.[Read More…]
- Turkey Travel AdvisoryBy Sam NewsSeptember 26, 2020Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
- Visit of Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Feltman to Ethiopia and KenyaBy Sam NewsNovember 9, 2021Office of the [Read More…]
- Department of Justice Issues Statement Regarding Decision in Skyworks v. CDCBy Sam NewsMarch 12, 2021More from: March 12, 2021 [Read More…]