January 19, 2022


News Network

Keynote Address of Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen on Combatting Fraud in the Age of COVID-19 at the BBB National Programs NAD 2020 Conference

21 min read

Remarks As Prepared For Delivery

Thank you Jim Boyle for that kind introduction.  I am very pleased to join you virtually and would like to thank BBB National Programs for inviting me to speak at the NAD 2020 program.   Programs like this facilitate productive dialogue that is good for the business community and ultimately for consumers.

Even in normal times, deceptive advertising has generally received close attention, but a global pandemic is not normal.  So high standards of truth and accuracy in advertising are even more vital, as we collectively endure a public health situation the likes of which we have not experienced since 1918, when more than 675,000 lives were lost in the United States.  

We have seen the current pandemic dramatically impact consumers across the country.  Stay-at-home orders have pushed people online for more of their shopping needs.  Travel restrictions and social distancing measures have upended consumer demand for many services.  Demand for certain essentials has risen steeply, sometimes creating shortages, rationing, rising prices, and distribution chain challenges.  The pandemic has added considerable financial and psychological stress to the lives of many consumers, including elderly consumers who often are the targets of unlawful schemes.

Picture this:  with the pandemic spreading, you see an ad for a “Miracle Mineral Solution”.  It is being offered by the “Genesis II Church of Health and Healing”.  It promises to prevent, treat, and even cure COVID19.  Even better, the Church has said that it can also help treat other serious diseases and disorders, including cancer, Alzheimer’s, autism, multiple sclerosis, and HIV/AIDS.  Amazing.  And fraudulent.

A father and three sons in Florida actually promoted this, and the so-called miracle solution was a chlorine dioxide bleach that is commonly used for industrial applications like waste water treatment and whitening textiles.  The FDA had specifically warned against people drinking this type of product, saying that doing so can cause nausea, vomiting, severe dehydration, life-threatening low blood pressure, and acute liver failure.  But these individuals apparently thought that claiming to be a church would legalize their operation and protect them from FDA regulation and the justice system.  It didn’t. The Justice Department in April obtained civil orders to stop the distribution of this fake cure, and in July the Department also brought criminal charges against the four individuals.

The Department of Justice and our enforcement colleagues across government have seen a disconcerting increase in reports of false, misleading, or unfair commercial practices like this as bad actors use the pandemic to exploit American consumers.  In particular, scammers have deployed an array of schemes, some sophisticated and others less so, touting products and services that purportedly prevent, cure, or treat COVID-19, but which don’t actually do so.  So what I’d like to do today is explain how DOJ approached this set of problems,  the different tools we have applied—criminal, civil, and other means—and what the results have been,  as well as some thoughts about enforcement more generally.

I’ll start at the onset of the pandemic emergency, around March of this year.  From the beginning, DOJ has had its sights focused on fraudsters who might intend to use the current emergency for their own illicit gain.  We knew from past experiences with other disasters that fraud and predatory behavior by unscrupulous individuals would spike.  The Attorney General directed the Department to mobilize quickly to safeguard the American public and businesses from coronavirus-related fraud and other illegal activity. 

Following the Attorney General’s lead, I then issued a memorandum on March 18 to U.S. Attorney’s Offices across the country to emphasize the importance of continuing to protect the public, notwithstanding the operational challenges that the virus posed.  I stressed that our personnel and agents should protect their own health but that we would not lose sight of our primary responsibility to protect others, including by arresting criminals who may otherwise have thought that the pandemic offered them safe harbor to commit crimes. 

The next day I further instructed Department personnel to guide the public to direct coronavirus-related complaints to the National Center for Disaster Fraud, which as its name suggests is tasked with facilitating the detection, prevention, investigation, and prosecution of criminal conduct related to disasters.  I also directed that DOJ utilize the FTC’s Sentinel database to share complaint information with other enforcement agencies.  This database aggregates complaints from more than 35 nationwide databases, and this sharing of information assists investigators to map criminal patterns, deconflict complaints, and broadcast alerts.  In addition, I directed U.S. Attorneys to appoint a Coronavirus Fraud Coordinator in each judicial district. 

You can find all of these memos at www.usdoj.gov/coronavirus/DOJresponse.

Our U.S. Attorneys and their teams in all 94 districts across the country snapped into action immediately.  Many established state-wide and regional task forces to ensure federal, state, and local law enforcement were coordinating closely.  They proactively engaged their communities to warn about the heightened threat of consumer fraud and to encourage the public to report any schemes to law enforcement. 

Some criminal typologies became apparent right away.  In a March 24 memorandum to all DOJ lawyers, I listed many problems that the public had already started to report.  Most prominently, we were seeing bad actors selling fake testing kits, cures, so-called “immunity” pills, and fake promises of personal protective equipment.  We also saw that exploiters were using robocalls, social media, and other mechanisms to offer fake services like free coronavirus testing in order to obtain credit card numbers and personally identifiable information that they would then unlawfully use for their own gain. 

In my memorandum, I also shared various legal authorities that our prosecutors had identified for potential consideration in cases that might involve these bad actors.  They included the mail, wire, computer, and healthcare fraud statutes that are widely known, and also included perhaps less widely known but equally important statutes like the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which prohibits, among other things, the marketing of misbranded or adulterated drugs.

Encouraging the public to report coronavirus-related criminal conduct has yielded real dividends.  Since we initially directed consumer concerns to the National Center for Disaster Fraud, the Center has received more than 74,000 calls and emails.  Those have been directed to the most appropriate law enforcement agency for further analysis.  The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center has also received more than 20,000 tips regarding suspicious coronavirus-related websites or social media postings.  Hundreds of cases that federal law enforcement has been investigating over the past several months derived from these complaints, and many turned into the cases that we have charged. 

Our objective has been to disrupt and take down these criminal schemes and to hold accountable those who bear responsibility.  In pursuit of that goal, we use a variety of legal tools. 

First and foremost, we have been promptly filing criminal charges against truly bad actors as soon as the evidence supports such action.  To date, we have filed charges in approximately 110 COVID-19-related cases nationwide, with hundreds more under active investigation.  We commenced our first criminal case on March 25, just 9 days after the Attorney General first instructed the Department to prioritize these matters.  The FBI arrested a Southern California man who posted videos to his Instagram account claiming that he had created both an injection that would cure coronavirus infections and a pill that would prevent infection.  The posts received well over a million views after only a few days.  This individual is also alleged to have attempted to defraud victims by recruiting them to invest in the scheme.  In June, he was indicted on 11 counts of wire fraud. 

The Department of Justice has also brought cases under other legal grounds for  criminal liability.  For instance, in late May, we secured a guilty plea from a woman who was selling an unregistered pesticide, which she marketed as providing protection against coronavirus.  The product itself was a device worn around the user’s neck and which purportedly contained chlorine dioxide.  It had not been registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, which criminalizes the sale of substances intended for preventing, destroying, or mitigating any pests—viruses included–that are not registered with the EPA.  This prosecution not only stopped this scheme in its tracks but also sent a clear message that all available laws whose language clearly applied would be deployed to stop fake schemes during the pandemic.

Another notable tool has been the anti-hoarding provision of the Defense Production Act.  Back in March, the President declared it the policy of the United States to prevent the hoarding of health and medical resources essential to combatting the spread of COVID-19.  Pursuant to a delegation of statutory authority, HHS Secretary Alex Azar designated 15 categories of health care medical resources as scarce.  With that designation, hoarding or price-gouging in the sale of the designated scarce medical supplies like respirators, face masks, sanitizer, and other essential medical supplies became a federal misdemeanor.  The Attorney General promptly created a task force at the Justice Department to identify, investigate, and prosecute violations of this anti-hoarding statute. 

To date, that task force has filed 13 criminal complaints and has hundreds of open investigations about hoarding or price-gouging.  The Hoarding & Price Gouging Task Force’s investigations also had the additional benefit of revealing serious frauds that the Department was then able to charge.  For instance, in April, we investigated a Georgia man who attempted to secure an order from the Department of Veterans Affairs for 125 million respirator masks and other personal protective equipment at prices that would have resulted in a total sale of over $750 million.  The individual represented that he could obtain millions of hard-to-find 3M respirator masks, which retailed for less than a dollar, and that he would sell them to the VA at nearly a 500% profit, contingent on the VA paying the purchase price upfront.  The price-gouging investigation determined that the suspect’s statements were fraudulent, and he was arrested and charged with wire fraud.  Similarly, just last week, the task force secured an indictment of a Thailand national for defrauding a New Jersey-based company that was seeking to purchase PPE.  This individual is alleged to have intentionally misrepresented his ability to sell 3M N95 respirators, including by providing fake 3M documents to the buyer.  After receiving nearly $1.5 million in advance payment for these masks, the defendant did not ship a single mask and ceased communicating with the victim.  The grand jury’s indictment included nine counts of wire fraud.   

The task force has also led the charge on combatting fraudulent sales of PPE that are counterfeit or defective.  Over the summer, the task force received a growing number of tips of PPE sellers falsely representing that their mask inventory is “FDA approved,” when neither the masks nor their manufacturer was approved.  In certain investigations, the task force has seen fabricated documents and packaging bearing an FDA logo to indicate the FDA’s approval, or fabricated labels purporting to establish a mask is manufactured by a reputable mask manufacturer like 3M. 

We have been particularly concerned with counterfeit PPE that simply fails the tests that PPE need to pass to be used safely. The task force has been coordinating closely with FDA to address these cases.  In May, the task force was working with the FDA to examine a shipment of respirator masks that a domestic PPE reseller had sold to a hospital system for a substantial profit.  The PPE was being shipped directly from a manufacturer in China to its end buyer when we had FDA examine the masks.  Testing showed that these KN-95 masks did not block 95% of particulate matter, but only 82%, making them ineffective for medical-grade protection against the spread of coronavirus.  It was fortunate that this shipment did not get to the buyer for hospital uses for which it was not adequate.

There are a number of other examples of criminal prosecutions in the package of press releases we provided.  But the 110 criminal prosecutions to date are not the only approach the Department has taken to curb coronavirus fraud, so let me turn now to the civil side of things. 

Section 1345 of Title 18 of the United States Code permits the Justice Department to commence civil actions to enjoin certain frauds, and this statute has proven to be an efficient tool to disrupt some types of schemes and protect consumers while federal agents conduct criminal investigations. 

To date, during the pandemic DOJ has filed  10 injunctive actions against coronavirus fraud schemes.    

The first of these civil actions was filed in late March, when we sought to enjoin the operators of the fraudulent website “coronavirusmedicalkit.com”.  The website claimed to offer consumers access to World Health Organization vaccine kits in exchange for a credit card payment of $4.95.  As I am sure I do not need to tell you, there were no coronavirus vaccines in March 2020.  The court issued a temporary restraining order requiring the registrar of the fraudulent website to immediately block public access to it, safeguarding consumers who may have been tempted to input their credit card information on that site.

In other cases, the Department secured injunctions against a Dallas health center that used Instagram to market ozone gas as a preventative and curative treatment for coronavirus, and against an individual purporting to be a Utah-based doctor who was selling a silver-ion solution, otherwise called “colloidal silver,” claiming it provided protection against coronavirus.  It does not, and to the contrary it could be dangerous.  After a court enjoined this scheme in April, DOJ prosecutors and federal law enforcement continued a criminal investigation into the matter.  Eventually, the Justice Department indicted the individual behind it, alleging that he fraudulently presented himself as a medical doctor and made false claims about the efficacy of ingesting sliver-based products.

In another  case we brought just last month, the Department secured a temporary restraining order against three residents of Vietnam who are alleged to have engaged in a wire fraud scheme involving the operation of more than 300 websites that marketed sanitizer and PPE to consumers across the country.  Thousands of Americans hailing from nearly every state purchased items from these websites, but the goods never arrived.  These individuals facilitated their scheme by setting up hundreds of email and bank accounts using fabricated identities to hide from their victims and law enforcement.  They also listed customer service contact information from unaffiliated businesses on their websites, which resulted in these unaffiliated businesses being inundated by customer complaints.  The civil restraining order required that these fraudulent websites be immediately taken down while law enforcement continues to investigate.

In addition to these types of criminal and civil actions, another method that has proven efficient at disrupting unlawful online schemes has been to engage with the private sector directly, including internet domain providers and registrars.  As I mentioned earlier, the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center has received and reviewed thousands of complaints about coronavirus-related scam websites marketing fake vaccines and cures, fraudulent charities, and other bogus goods and services.  We have referred thousands of these fraudulent websites to the private-sector companies that manage and host those websites, so they may review whether these websites violate their terms of service.  Based on these reviews to date, we estimate that hundreds of malicious or fraudulent websites have been taken down, and much more quickly and with fewer law enforcement resources than would be required if we instead relied solely on criminal or civil actions to disrupt these schemes. 

Our engagement with domain registrars and hosting services has encouraged other positive developments.  Many have established teams to review their domains for coronavirus-related fraud and other malicious activity, putting them in the position to take appropriate action against fraudulent websites on their own. 

Our engagement efforts in this regard also include working with cybersecurity researchers who are making important contributions by creating sophisticated tools to spot fraudulent or malicious websites out there on the web.  We have also worked to provide training and technical assistance in other countries that face similar challenges. 

As all these examples demonstrate, the Justice Department’s response to coronavirus-related fraud has been multifaceted.  We have worked to apply every proper authority and resource at our disposal to tackle this problem.  We have done that successfully so far, and we plan to continue to do so. 

And let me add that it is good to see BBB National Programs playing a role as well.  I understand that the National Advertising Division and the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council have, as of October 1, addressed the marketing of 97 coronavirus-related products or services challenged as false or misleading.  82 of those matters were resolved after the advertiser agreed to discontinue the challenged advertising, and 3 were referred to the FTC or FDA for investigation.  This is valuable work, as it fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace, which may be more critical now than ever.  It also creates a better experience for consumers, many of whom could use all the help they can get.  And it bolsters wider law enforcement and regulatory efforts.    

What about reputable companies who have products that might be helpful during the pandemic, though they are not preventions or cures?  To state the obvious, they should take care to say accurate things.  That is where good legal counsel can play a very constructive role.

Now, having talked about the different tools to address dishonest efforts during the pandemic, let me take a step back and offer some additional perspectives about how we think about this particular set of problems.  The Justice Department’s perspective has been, and will continue to be, that charging decisions must take into account the larger context of the public health crisis.  The regulatory landscape has evolved over the past seven months, especially with respect to medical treatments and supplies, as regulators and the private sector strive to find solutions in the safest and swiftest way possible.  That will undoubtedly remain the case as we move forward.   The Administration has approached regulatory matters with an appropriate degree of flexibility to bolster our collective public health efforts, and similarly, the Justice Department has approached its duties in a way that supports the broader goals of the public health response. 

Said simply, the decisions we make to open investigations or to bring charges are intended to help the pandemic response, not hinder it.  DOJ has been implementing this policy by focusing on rooting out true scams and frauds to protect the public rather than prosecuting good-faith minor missteps.

We also aim to help consumers to remain vigilant and be on the lookout themselves for fraudulent goods.  If something seems too good to be true, it usually is, and it is always worth a little extra checking.

Finally, I’d like to touch on one other aspect of the pandemic, which is the relief funds and loans that became available under the CARES Act. Once that legislation passed at the end of last March, the Justice Department expanded its coronavirus-related fraud efforts to help protect the integrity of those federal relief funds.  One major program was the Paycheck Protection Program, which provides forgivable loans to small businesses to ensure that they can meet payroll and pay other business-related expenses.  As of the August 8 PPP loan application deadline, over 5.2 million loan applications had been approved, lending over $525 billion.  Unfortunately, we received numerous reports that fraudsters have been diverting paycheck protection funds by submitting false applications. 

Here again, the Department has taken swift action to uncover fraud and thwart such schemes, having already charged 65 people with defrauding this relief program.  These individuals collectively have stolen or attempted to steal nearly $227 million in PPP loans in amounts as small as $30,000 and as large as $24 million. 

And some of these frauds were truly brazen.  In a case charged just last week, a North Carolina man is alleged to have applied for $6 million in loans using sham companies named after characters from the show “Game of Thrones.”  In other cases, alleged cheaters have used these relief funds to buy exotic cars and diamond jewelry.  In late July in Miami, for example, we arrested and charged a man who used over $300,000 of a PPP loan to buy a Lamborghini.  In August, we arrested a Texas man who spent PPP loan proceeds not only on a Lamborghini but also a Ford F-350 pickup truck, a Rolex watch, real estate, and several trips to nightclubs and other clubs.  These are sad reminders that even during a pandemic there are people who are not looking out for the common good.

Hopefully this overview gives you a fairly broad sense of how the Department of Justice has answered the challenge that coronavirus-related fraud has presented.  Today, we have hundreds of active investigations ongoing and are closely coordinating with investigative agencies across the federal government.  Coronavirus-related wrongdoing will continue to be a DOJ priority for the foreseeable future.

Let me wrap up with the English writer Samuel Johnson’s observation that “[w]hoever commits a fraud is guilty not only of the particular injury to him who he deceives, but of the diminution of that confidence which constitutes not only the ease but the existence of society.”  Each fraud victimizes all of us, not just the particular target of the fraudster’s scheme.  That is why this work is fundamental to the Justice Department’s mission of protecting Americans and promoting the rule of law.  So I appreciate the role that everyone participating today can play in helping ensure that Americans are not exploited during the pandemic.  Combatting fraud ensures that our marketplaces remain viable and accessible to reputable businesses that benefit and engender the trust of the American consumer. 

Thank you for this opportunity to share these observations today.

News Network

  • Vitol Inc. Agrees to Pay over $135 Million to Resolve Foreign Bribery Case
    In Crime News
    Vitol Inc. (Vitol), the U.S. affiliate of the Vitol group of companies, which together form one of the largest energy trading firms in the world, has agreed to pay a combined $135 million to resolve the Justice Department’s investigation into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to resolve a parallel investigation in Brazil.
    [Read More…]
  • Joint EU-U.S. Statement Following the EU-U.S. Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting
    In Crime News
    On 22 June 2021, the Portuguese Presidency of the Council of the European Union hosted the EU-U.S. Ministerial Meeting on Justice and Home Affairs in Lisbon. The United States was represented by the Secretary for Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas, and by Deputy Assistant Attorney General and DOJ Counselor for International Affairs Bruce Swartz. The European Union, hosting the meeting, was represented by the Vice-President of the European Commission Margaritis Schinas, the Commissioner for Justice Didier Reynders, the Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson, as well as the Portuguese Ministers for Justice Francisca Van Dunem and for Home Affairs Eduardo Cabrita, on behalf of the current Presidency of the Council of the European Union. The incoming Presidency of the Council was represented by the Slovenian Minister of the Interior Aleš Hojs.
    [Read More…]
  • Swedish National Day
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Technology Modernization Fund: Implementation of Recommendations Can Improve Fee Collection and Proposal Cost Estimates
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found The Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) provides awards to agencies to, among other things, modernize aging federal information systems. Of the initial $175 million that Congress appropriated for TMF, the Technology Modernization Board had approved 11 projects totaling about $89 million (see table), as of August 2021. Agency proposals were to include estimates of any project-related savings; agencies could use these savings to satisfy the requirement that they reimburse the TMF for any transfers within 5 years. For the seven projects approved in 2018 and 2019, two have reported generating cost savings but those savings are not documented. For the remaining five projects, two no longer plan on savings, two plan on savings starting in 1 to 3 years, and one does not know when savings will begin. Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) Project Awards, as of August 31, 2021 (in dollars) Agency and TMF project Total award amount Date of award Department of Agriculture (Agriculture) Farmers.Gov Portal 4,000,000 June 7, 2018 Department of Energy Enterprise Cloud Email 3,743,702 June 7, 2018 Department of Housing and Urban Development Unisys Migration 13,850,013 June 7, 2018 Agriculture Infrastructure Optimization 500,000 October 29, 2018 Department of Labor (Labor) Visa Application Transformation 3,500,000 October 29, 2018 General Services Administration (GSA) Application Modernization 9,816,833 October 29, 2018 GSA NewPay 16,986,021 February 11, 2019 Agriculture Specialty Crops Systems Modernization 8,000,000 October 21, 2019 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charge and Case Management System Modernization 4,000,000 October 21, 2019 U.S. Customs Border and Protection Automated Commercial Environment Collections Module 15,000,000 July 27, 2020 Labor Data Modernization 9,600,000 March 21, 2021 Total 88,996,569   Source: GAO analysis of agency TMF project documentation as of August 31, 2021. | GAO-22-105117 In March 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 appropriated an additional $1 billion to the TMF. In May 2021, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provided updated TMF guidance to agencies regarding this $1 billion. Among other things, the guidance (1) prioritizes projects that cut across agencies and address immediate cybersecurity gaps, and (2) allows agencies to apply for a partial or minimal reimbursement of the TMF funds provided (partial is agencies repaying 25 to 100 percent of the award while minimal is greater than zero but less than 25 percent). On September 30, 2021, the General Services Administration (GSA) announced the approval of seven new projects with awards totaling at least $311 million (one of the seven projects is classified; no award figure is publicly available). In deciding on these seven, the Technology Modernization Board received 113 project proposals requesting a total of more than $2.3 billion. Regarding TMF operating costs and fees collected to offset those costs, as of August 2021, GSA had received fee payments totaling about $810,000, or about 29 percent of its operating expenses of $2.8 million (see table below). Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) Program Management Office Operating Expenses and Fee Collection, as of August 31, 2021 (in dollars) Fiscal year Operating expenses Fee collection 2018 408,662 0 2019 851,958 33,165 2020 835,725 245,096 2021a 712,170 530,628 Total 2,808,515 808,889 Source: GAO analysis of TMF Program Management Office and TMF project documentation, | GAO-22-105117 a2021 operating expenses and fee collection are for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2021 (Oct-Sept). A key reason for this shortfall is that six of the seven initially approved projects narrowed their scopes. This led to reduced award amounts transferred to agencies, which in turn resulted in about a $1.12 million reduction in anticipated fees. Relatedly, OMB and GSA have not yet implemented GAO's prior recommendation to develop and implement a plan to fully recover operating expenses with fee collection. Doing so would provide greater assurance that fees collected would be sufficient to offset operating costs. OMB funding guidelines require projects to include a reliable estimate of any project-related savings. However, most of the TMF projects' reported savings estimates derived from cost estimates continue to be unreliable. Specifically, three of the four projects reviewed did not fully incorporate best practices for a reliable cost estimate, as defined in OMB Circular A-11 (which references GAO's Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide ) (see table below). GAO Assessment of Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) Projects' Cost Estimates   Characteristic TMF Project Comprehensive Well-documented Accurate Credible Department of Agriculture Specialty Crops System Modernization Minimally met Minimally met Minimally met Not met Department of Labor Data Modernization Partially met Partially met Partially met Not met U.S. Customs and Border Protection Automated Commercial Environment Collections Module Met Met Substantially met Met U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charge and Case Management System Modernization Partially met Minimally met Minimally met Not met Source: GAO analysis of agency TMF cost estimate documentation as of August 31, 2021. | GAO-22-105117 Note: Evidence was provided to satisfy a given characteristic's best practices: Not met = none; minimally met = a small portion; partially met = about half; substantially met = a large portion; met = complete evidence. Given the significant expansion in available TMF funds, it is increasingly important that GSA implement GAO's prior recommendation to improve the instructions for the TMF cost estimate template required of each proposal. Such action would help ensure that the TMF board is reviewing documentation that is complete, accurate, and reliable. Why GAO Did This Study Enacted in 2017, the provisions commonly referred to as the Modernizing Government Technology Act established the TMF in recognition of the challenges in modernizing federal information systems. OMB and GSA administer the TMF, and a Technology Modernization Board comprised of federal IT executives reviews agency project proposals. Pursuant to the law, OMB's 2018 TMF guidance directed agencies with approved projects to reimburse the amounts transferred from the fund and pay a fee, within 5 years of award. Fees were to be based in part on a percentage of award amounts transferred to the agency. GSA uses TMF appropriations to cover its operating expenses, and collects the fees from awarded projects to offset these expenses. The act includes a provision for GAO to report biannually on the TMF. This second TMF report, among other things, (1) identifies the status of the fund and approved projects, (2) determines the TMF's operating costs and fees collected to offset those costs, and (3) assesses the reliability of selected projects' cost saving estimates. GAO identified projects approved for TMF funding and reviewed the extent to which selected projects were generating cost savings. GAO also reviewed OMB and GSA's administrative fund processes, and GSA financial data on TMF operating costs. In addition, GAO analyzed TMF project and supporting cost estimate documentation for the four projects awarded funds between September 2019 and August 2021 and compared its analysis to the characteristics of a reliable cost estimate.
    [Read More…]
  • Suriname Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel [Read More…]
  • GAO Strategic Plan: Serving the Congress and the Nation 2010-2015 (Supersedes GAO-07-1SP)
    In U.S GAO News
    This document supersedes GAO-07-1SP, GAO Strategic Plan, 2007-2012, March 2007. This document presents GAO's strategic plan for serving the Congress for fiscal years 2010 through 2015. In keeping with our commitment to update our plan every 3 years, it describes our proposed goals and strategies for supporting the Congress and the nation as the United States undergoes a period of change, daunting challenges, and promising opportunities. We have identified eight trends that provide context for our plan: (1) evolving security threats; (2) urgent fiscal sustainability and debt challenges; (3) economic recovery and restored job growth; (4) changing dynamics of global interdependence and shifts in power; (5) advances in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; (6) increasing impact of networks and virtualization; (7) shifting roles in government and governance; and (8) demographic and societal changes confronting the young and old. Since we issued our last plan, significant changes have affected our nation's commitments and fiscal outlook. Our nation has multiple wartime-related commitments as it winds down one war in Iraq, increases its presence in another in Afghanistan, and re-examines commitments in Pakistan. The global financial crisis emerged as a new national security threat as it destabilized economies around the world. Our nation faced the deepest recession since the Great Depression, with unemployment exceeding 9 percent and economists forecasting that recovery could be both slow and fragile.
    [Read More…]
  • Indiana Man Sentenced to 46 Months in Prison for Making Racially Motivated Threats Toward Black Neighbor and for Unlawfully Possessing Firearms
    In Crime News
    An Indiana man was sentenced Friday in federal court for making racially motivated threats to intimidate and interfere with his neighbor, who is Black, in violation of the criminal provision of the Fair Housing Act, and for unlawfully possessing firearms.
    [Read More…]
  • Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya, Special Envoy for the Northern Triangle Ricardo Zuniga, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Deputy Assistant Secretary Marta Youth, and Senior Advisor to the USAID Administrator and Executive Director of the USAID Northern Triangle Task Force Michael Camilleri On the Collaborative Migration Management Strategy and Root Causes Strategy Toward Migration
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Marta Costanzo Youth, [Read More…]
  • Brush guide sentenced after abandoning people during freeze
    In Justice News
    A 27-year-old Harlingen [Read More…]
  • Defense Management: DOD Needs to Establish Clear Goals and Objectives, Guidance, and a Designated Budget to Manage Its Biometrics Activities
    In U.S GAO News
    The Department of Defense (DOD), in its response to unconventional threats from terrorists, uses biometrics technologies that identify physical attributes, including fingerprints and iris scans. However, coordinating the development and implementation of biometrics and ensuring interoperability across DOD has been difficult to achieve. Biometrics also is an enabling technology for identity management, a concept that seeks to manage personally identifiable information to enable improved governmentwide sharing and analysis of identity information. GAO was asked to examine the extent to which DOD has established biometrics goals and objectives, implementing guidance for managing biometrics activities, and a designated budget. To address these objectives, GAO reviewed documentation, including DOD biometrics policy and directives, and interviewed key DOD officials involved with making policy and funding decisions regarding biometrics.DOD established, in October 2006, the Principal Staff Assistant, who is the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, and an Executive Committee as part of its attempts to improve the management of its biometrics activities. However, as of August 2008, it had not established management practices that include clearly defined goals and objectives, implementing guidance that clarifies decision-making procedures for the Executive Committee, and a designated biometrics budget. First, while DOD has stated some general goals for biometrics, such as providing recognized leadership and comprehensive planning policy, it has not articulated specific program objectives, the steps needed to achieve those objectives, and the priorities, milestones, and performance measures needed to gauge results. Second, DOD issued a directive in 2008 to establish biometrics policy and assigned general responsibilities to the Executive Committee and the Principal Staff Assistant but has not issued implementing guidance that clarifies decision-making procedures. The Executive Committee is chaired by the Principal Staff Assistant and includes a wide array of representatives from DOD communities such as intelligence, acquisitions, networks and information integration, personnel, and policy and the military services. The Executive Committee is responsible for resolving biometrics management issues, such as issues between the military services and joint interests resulting in duplications of effort. However, the committee does not have guidance for making decisions that can resolve management issues. Past DOD reports have noted difficulties in decision making and accountability in the management of its biometrics activities. Third, DOD also has not established a designated budget for biometrics that links resources to specific objectives and provides a consolidated view of the resources devoted to biometrics activities. Instead, it has relied on initiative-by-initiative requests for supplemental funding, which may not provide a predictable stream of funding for biometrics. Prior GAO work on performance management demonstrates that successful programs incorporate such key management practices, and for several years, DOD reports and studies have also called for DOD to establish such practices for its biometrics activities. Similarly, a new presidential directive issued in June 2008 supports the establishment of these practices in addition to calling for a governmentwide framework for the sharing of biometrics data. DOD officials have said that DOD's focus has been on quickly fielding biometrics systems and maximizing existing systems to address immediate warfighting needs in Afghanistan and Iraq. This focus on responding to immediate warfighting needs and the absence of the essential management practices have contributed to operational inefficiencies in managing DOD's biometrics activities, such as DOD's difficulties in sharing biometrics data within and outside the department. For example, in May 2008 GAO recommended that DOD establish guidance specifying a standard set of biometrics data for collection during military operations in the field. These shortcomings may also impede DOD's implementation of the June 2008 presidential directive and the overall identity management operating concept.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken At a Press Availability
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Federal Charges Against Stanford University Researcher Expanded
    In Crime News
    A federal grand jury issued a superseding indictment charging Chen Song with visa fraud, obstruction of justice, destruction of documents, and false statements in connection with a scheme to conceal and lie about her status as a member of the People’s Republic of China’s military forces while in the United States, the Justice Department announced yesterday. 
    [Read More…]
  • Puerto Rico Mayor Pleads Guilty to Accepting Bribes in Exchange for Millions in Municipal Contracts
    In Crime News
    A mayor pleaded guilty yesterday in Puerto Rico to engaging in a bribery scheme in which he received cash payments in exchange for awarding municipal contracts to a particular company (Company A). Relatedly, a Puerto Rico contractor was arrested today for allegedly paying bribes and kickbacks to the mayor.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks at a Roundtable with Democracy Activists and Civil Society
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Keeping Faith in the Public Square
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • On the First Anniversary of the Death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi 
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • Navistar Inc. to Reduce 10,000 Tons of NOx Emissions and Pay $52 Million Civil Penalty in Federal Settlement of Clean Air Act Claims
    In Crime News
    Navistar Inc., an integrated manufacturer of trucks and diesel engines based in Lisle, Illinois, has agreed to mitigate at least 10,000 tons of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions and pay a $52 million civil penalty in a consent decree, lodged today, to resolve violations of the Clean Air Act. In particular, Navistar illegally introduced into commerce on‑highway Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines (HDDEs) that were not covered by EPA-issued certificates of conformity.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken At the Launch of the U.S.-Germany Dialogue on Holocaust Issues with German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Covid-19 Housing Protections: Moratoriums Have Helped Limit Evictions, but Further Outreach Is Needed
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found Eviction moratoriums at the federal, state, and local levels reduced eviction filings during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, some eligible renters may not have benefitted from a recent federal moratorium. GAO's analysis of 63 jurisdictions found that the median rate of eviction filings was about 74 percent lower in the last week of July 2020—when a moratorium included in the CARES Act expired—than in the same week in 2019. Eviction filings remained lower throughout 2020 (relative to 2019) but gradually increased during a separate moratorium ordered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in September 2020 (see fig.). During this moratorium, jurisdictions without separate state or local moratoriums experienced larger increases in eviction filings, which suggests that some renters may not fully understand how to use the CDC moratorium (completing required documentation). CDC extended its moratorium through March 31, 2021, but has taken few steps to promote awareness and understanding of the moratorium and its requirements. Clear, accurate, and timely information is essential to keep the public informed during the pandemic. Without a communication and outreach plan, including federal coordination, CDC will be missing an opportunity to ensure that eligible renters avoid eviction. Year-over-Year Percentage Change in Eviction Filings in 63 Jurisdictions Note: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) moratorium is active through March 31, 2021. Local moratoriums include separate state or local eviction moratoriums. Unlike the CARES Act, CDC's moratorium does not prohibit eviction filings, which could explain some increases. By late January 2021, Treasury had disbursed 99 percent of the $25 billion in Emergency Rental Assistance funds to state and other eligible grantees responsible for making rent and utility payments to recipients. Treasury's initial program guidance issued that month did not fully define some program requirements and included requirements that could have delayed the delivery of funds or deter participation. In late February 2021, Treasury updated its guidance to address several of these concerns, such as by providing grantees with flexibility for prioritizing lower income applicants and allowing written attestation of income. Although the guidance did not clarify certain data collection and spending requirements, officials said they will continue to update guidance to address stakeholder concerns and strike a balance between accountability and administrative efficiency. GAO will continue to actively monitor these efforts. Why GAO Did This Study Millions of renters and property owners continue to experience housing instability and financial challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address these concerns, Congress and CDC created eviction moratoriums, and Congress appropriated $25 billion to Treasury to disburse to state and local grantees to administer emergency rental assistance programs to help those behind on their rent. The CARES Act includes a provision for GAO to monitor federal efforts related to COVID-19. This report examines, among other objectives, (1) how eviction moratoriums have contributed to housing stability during the pandemic and (2) Treasury's implementation of the Emergency Rental Assistance program. GAO analyzed data on eviction filings and local policies in a sample of 63 jurisdictions (selected based on data availability) from January to December 2020. GAO also analyzed Census Bureau survey data on rental payments and data from federal housing entities on mortgage forbearance. GAO interviewed officials from CDC, Treasury, and organizations representing renters, property owners, and rental assistance grantees.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Blinken’s Call with Swiss President Parmelin
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]


Network News © 2005 Area.Control.Network™ All rights reserved.